Skip to content

LETTER: Increase not needed for council travel expenses

Grumpy Taxpayer$ has raised concerns about the size and cost of conference delegations sent collectively by neighbouring South Island municipalities and in particular by Langford.
34485140_web1_LETTERfountainPenC

Grumpy Taxpayer$ has raised concerns about the size and cost of conference delegations sent collectively by neighbouring South Island municipalities and in particular by Langford.

That said, we are pleased Langford council will finally update an expense policy that was drafted 17 years ago in 2006. The expense policy needs to be rewritten with more clarity for council, staff and the public

But taxpayers have questions.

Should a per diem rate of $60 in 2006 – that’s $87 in today’s dollars, according to the Bank of Canada inflation calculator – even be increased? So, it appears travel expenses were exceedingly high for many years.

The current B.C. government employee travel allowance is very comparable to Langford.

Saanich council – managing a much larger and more complex jurisdiction – is entitled to daily allowance for the cost of meals and gratuities to a maximum of $65. Incidentals of $10 are not paid unless there’s an overnight stay. A daily allowance is not paid when meals are provided.

It’s hoped Langford council will follow their newly minted code of conduct and particularly the sections on ‘information management’ and ‘communication with the public.’

Most sizeable municipalities in B.C. post public documents such as annual council financial disclosures, remuneration and council travel expense policies on their civic website. It’s a hallmark of good governance, transparency and accountability.

Why doesn’t Langford?

Stan Bartlett, vice-chair

Grumpy Taxpayer$ of Greater Victoria